You're on the same couch, both on your phones, the TV on. Here's how to put down the screens and actually be together again.
December 18, 2023
·
5
min to read
You tell your partner that something they did hurt you. Maybe it was a comment in front of friends, or being left waiting again, or the flat tone they used when you were already raw. You barely get the sentence out before it comes back: you're overreacting. Or you're too sensitive. Or that's not a big deal. And just like that, the thing that actually hurt you is gone. You are no longer two people sorting out a moment. You are one person trying to prove you were even allowed to feel it.
Watch how fast the subject changes. You came in to talk about the hurt. Within half a minute, the conversation is about whether your reaction is reasonable, whether you're being dramatic, whether you always do this. The original feeling never gets touched. It does not get heard, or argued with, or comforted. It just gets reclassified as a flaw in you, and now you're defending your basic right to have an inner life at all.
This is the move people rarely have a name for, and naming it matters. The hurt was the topic. The instant it becomes are you allowed to be hurt, something has been swapped out from under you. You can feel the floor move even when you can't say why. That sliding feeling, that sense of arguing about the wrong thing, is one of the most common things people bring into their conversations with Maia. They almost never lead with "my partner invalidates me." They say, "I don't even know if I'm overreacting," which, it turns out, is the whole problem in one sentence.
Once is a bad night. The damage is in the repetition. When the answer to this hurt is reliably you shouldn't feel that way, two things start to bend.
First, you stop trusting your own reactions. You used to know when something stung. Now you run a check first: is this real, or am I being too much again? You're outsourcing the most basic read on your own life. Second, you go quiet. Sharing stopped being worth the cost, because every time you open the door you end up smaller than when you started, so you keep more and more to yourself. That is not you becoming low-maintenance. That is the relationship teaching you that your inner world is a problem to manage rather than something a partner wants to know about.
Here is the line worth holding onto: a feeling does not have to be correct to be real. You can be wrong about the facts of what happened and still be genuinely hurt, and the hurt still deserves a response. Dismissal collapses those two things on purpose. It treats "you misread the situation" and "your feeling doesn't count" as the same verdict. They are not.
This is the part that decides everything, because two very different things wear the same words.
Some partners minimize your feelings because they are bad at feelings, theirs and yours. Emotion makes them itch, so they reach for logic or a fix or a "you're fine" to make the discomfort stop. It lands as dismissal, but the engine underneath is their own unease, not contempt for you. Often it is a sign that neither of you is fully emotionally available yet, and that is something a willing person can actually learn to do better. A partner like this is usually relieved, not threatened, when you tell them plainly what you need.
And some partners dismiss you because it works. Calling you "too sensitive" or "crazy" keeps you on the back foot, doing the apologizing, doubting your own version of events. If the pattern reliably ends with you smaller and them off the hook, if it travels with put-downs, or with you walking on eggshells to avoid setting it off, that is not clumsiness. That is control, and no rephrasing on your end fixes it, because being heard was never the goal. If there is fear in this, or a sense that you are managing someone's temper, that is bigger than a communication gap. Talk to someone you trust, or reach the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 (US). Chronic invalidation that leaves you doubting your own mind sits closer to that line than most people want to admit.
One more distinction, because it gets blurred. If your partner disagrees about what happened but still treats your feeling as real, that is just disagreement, and it's survivable. If they hear the words but completely miss the emotion underneath, that may be less about dismissal and more about simply not feeling heard, which has a gentler fix. Telling your partner the feeling itself is wrong, or too much, is the specific one that does the quiet damage.
The trap is arguing the verdict. The second you start proving the feeling is "valid enough" to qualify, you've agreed to let them grade it. Don't. Try moving the conversation back to where it started.
And a couple of moves to put down, because they pour fuel on it: turning up the volume to make the feeling register, and snapping back with "well your feelings are ridiculous too." Both hand them the proof that you're the unreasonable one. Going silent and quietly filing the night away as more evidence is the slowest-burning version of the same mistake.
Say you do all of it. Calmly, clearly, more than once. And they keep minimizing. Then stop watching them and check one thing in yourself: are you starting to doubt your own reactions? Not "are they being difficult" but "have I lost confidence in my own read on what hurts me." That answer matters more than anything they say, because a willing-but-clumsy partner gets better with practice, while a pattern that steadily erodes your trust in your own mind is not waiting on better phrasing from you. The problem there is their willingness, not your technique, and the right words will not reach a person who isn't trying to hear you.
If you want to get clear on which one you're actually living with, and figure out how to ask for what you need before the conversation flips on you, it can help to talk it through with Maia first, in plain language, for your exact situation. Sometimes just hearing your own read reflected back, instead of argued with, is enough to remind you it was real the whole time.
Like It? Share this article:
Our Mission & Editorial Standards
At Maia, we're passionate about helping couples thrive. That's why we prioritize providing you with accurate, actionable, and science-backed content.
Our blog posts are grounded in the latest research on relationships, communication, and psychology. We work closely with a team of relationship experts to ensure our content reflects the most up-to-date knowledge in the field.
Our goal is to empower you with the knowledge and skills you need to create a fulfilling and lasting relationship.
Stay tuned for insightful articles, expert advice, and practical tips – all designed to help your love story flourish.